LOL – I just took a few seconds and looked out of pure belated curiosity, it ranks better than your own site.

Talk about being demonstrably stupid.

So- now what? Are you going to try and submit another DMCA Takedown to Google? Nice try btw.

this blog doesn’t rank for shit

I’m not sure of the last time I or anyone else cared what a personal blog ranked. In fact, my post on this blog was, what, 4 years ago? Obviously I care so much about this blog I’m crying that you have beaten me in a search term on your own domain name. But that’s okay, this blog is #4 according to Google Search Console. So as far as getting the click (which there are some 18, 19 per day on this particular blog post), what matters is who has the catchiest title and “accusations” in the blog post seems to do the trick.

But- Why? Just why? Why would you come commenting on a 4 year old blog post adding more relevancy to my blog for YOUR search term by virtue of commenting with your website details in tact so that this blog post might in fact rank higher? Links on this site are all rel=”nofollow” (meaning you get no backlink credit) so in your case, that’s not smart. I would have figured that your new friend would have advised you as much as much of an expert as he claims to be in IT.

I will not tell you how because it would allow you to change them.

You do realize that once it’s in the public like this and archive.org picks up on it (and they have), you cannot delete it, right? I mean, if I did, you could immediately point to archive.org and prove it anywhere and everywhere. So, pardon me if I find it a little perplexing that you would rather a falsehood to remain online rather than contacting the person to try and correct it or posting the truth. Truth, in my opinion, should be the most important goal of any decent human being because the truth can’t hurt – it might be uncomfortable, but it can never hurt.

If I had to take a guess to what is actually happening here, I would say someone, maybe an investor or a game developer decided to pass up an offer you made because they found this blog post and you wanted to post what you did to show you had some kind of evidence that you likely presented to them without giving me the opportunity to refute it. I hate to inform you, but when you rob someone of the opportunity to defend themselves when you make an accusation, you have invalidated the very accusation you’re trying to levy.

Again, I would have thought that your friend who has done nothing but detract the truth would have notified you of this long ago. I guess not. Perhaps it’s because he’s been legally thrashed about a bit or perhaps it’s because he was caught in a few lies on another forum and his job is now at stake being the public face for a game title. At any rate, you should likely re-examine what you were told – all of it because as it stands this has become very irrelevant – I’ve done many other websites over the past 4 years including government websites, politician’s websites, church websites and currently there has been and likely never will be any civil litigation against me and that’s strictly because everything you were told was false.

Correct me if I’m wrong – but I did tell you that your website was being eaten up by bots. Not just any bot either but on your xmlrpc which are brute force bots trying to guess your password. You had WordFence installed on your site which if I had used ANY “hacked” or illegitimate plugins it would have been screaming at you about it. Instead it was screaming about the weak passwords on the site (not just yours but some other users). I warned you of this, even told you that your pw was found in a hacked database. But of course, this couldn’t possibly be your fault your new friend, I’m sure, reassured you of this.

The only reason you wouldn’t want to present your side of the argument either in public or in private is because you simply don’t have an argument. Change my mind. No, you don’t want to point out the image that proves I’m lying because none of them do. You’re hoping to somehow fluster me into removing all images I bet and you surely don’t want to levy an accusation against any of these images being unauthentic because you know dammed well I’ll post a video of the web page with the URL visible and the web page moving around so everyone knows it’s legit.

And why do you keep rebranding your website so much? Seems like I create a post calling out your website, you shut it down a few months later and change the name…

And I’ll leave it at that.

The mental gymnastics you’re willing to leap into here is utterly amazing to watch.

“Thomas” who I addressed here was TJ (Ie, Thomas James) who I know personally. When you search “Thomas” on this website (which quarries blogs and pages, not comments) it displays an article about the 2nd Amendment. If you knew anything about that, you would know that Thomas JEFFERSON was very influential over it’s framing and is mentioned several times and quoted.

Also, I have Tor and you seriously believe that I don’t check search results from that to block all of Google’s tracking methods to completely UN-PERSONALIZE it’s search? You really aren’t that intelligent, are you?

Thanks for the support Thomas. The truck was used BTW, it’s not new. Only the Camper and Journey are new. I wanted something I could piddle with and something I’m not afraid to scratch the paint on ;)

Well, I read this blog about once a week. I know Mike personally I also know his wife and kids. We even go to church together at the Bridge Church in Princeton. I can tell you that he’s literally the last person on earth to do what you have been accusing him of. Actually being a third party looking at this now, you are literally doing what Mike said you are doing. You are demanding him remove the very evidence that proves he is not full of shit as you put it. You should see Mike’s FB page. There is about 50 people laughing at your silly attempts to defame him. Between you and your schmuck pal the script kiddy as we have taken to call him you are the laughing stock of most of the business owners in Wayne County and around the Chamber of Commerce.

I don’t think you have yet realized just how much of a blessing you and your friend has been for Mike and his family. Not only has an entire county banded together to help the guy, but his act of stopping the attacks on his networks and to shut down the defaming website has led many of us that are members of the Chamber to enlist his services which has made the kid quite popular and wealthy.

Did you know you were on the news here at WRAL on December 14th? You were! Mike was being interviewed by a reporter with Congressman George Holding and they both made mention of you and the attacker. That guy has done you no favors. Now that you’re associated with him as a cohort and your name is the only name that the media or anyone else knows, guess who’s face gets associated with this ordeal? Your face which is the most hated face in this state right now.

I have to ask, did you know that you were defaming an Eagle Scout community pillar small business owner and veteran before or after you started?

Anywho just so you know Mike has two new vehicles a big Dodge pickup being one of them and a RV trailer and a new house and a new building for his company. All of this has happened since he made the news with your name Matt Ince flying around. As I said you two have been a blessing for the kid and in many ways I am happy for mike that this happened.

By the way, if anyone believes that anything I have posted is fake, please simply say so here. I’m not against getting a screen video of the actual messages sent which proves that the narrative that Matt is portraying simply doesn’t add up.

Defamation? Hate to break it to you bub, but you already did that on your website which has given me the legal right (actually it’s a legal obligation) to mitigate any damages you may have caused by posting those conversations which you don’t want posted which actually screams malice to me.

The only image of yours that I posted is your avatar which is licensed by Gravatar as Public Use. I don’t need permission to use it, especially in a means to identify a persona online that uses that exact avatar. You can’t give an image to Automatic for them to share with the world to identify you on WordPress and then turn around and claim copyright infringement when they share it and someone uses it to identify you. I’m sorry, but that’s shady. Obviously you’re trying to duck this. That’s the only reason whey you would come forward asking me to remove your image and private conversations (in which no expectation of privacy is granted using Google’s Gmail system which shares information and email content with thousands of providers to target ads at you).

So, you’re not worried and no one visits my blog? Then why did you comment?

As I see it, this blog comes up on Google above your website when searching thePCMR. The fact of the matter here is, you should have thought twice about trying to side and join forces with a doxxer who didn’t have the balls to even identify himself to you. He’s who got you into this mess. I’m simply protecting myself. You’re the one that started all of the slanderous BS parroting what the doxxer had to say on your own website. That was your choice, my choice is simply to defend myself.

I wonder, are you still in contact with him? Have you noticed something strange? Yeah strange shit happens when someone starts posting ‘REAL’ defamation online and court orders are sent out to shut down their websites.

If you have any further legal questions about the validity of this blog post, you can contact my attorney:

Harry Lorrello, Associate
Strickland, Agnar, and Associates, LLC
(919) 735-8888

Have a nice day.

do you know that Mike Wells has used your images? Do you know that what he has done here is not legal?

It’s actually very legal:

https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html

Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as [pay close attention here] criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:

Oh this next part is fun:

Mike Wells, you are so full of shit its unreal.

Citation please, because I’ve shown that I’m NOT full of shit. In fact, it is you that is trying to get me to remove the actual proof demonstrating that fact.